Skipping Lecture

This month’s Launchings column by David Bressoud identifies the lecture format as  “The Worst Way to Teach” calculus.   Amen, I say.  Eighteen years ago, when I decided to use a guided discovery model for my abstract algebra course, I felt as if I needed to justify my move away from the norm, especially since the course is required for the major.  (My colleague Mike Olinick had already been using the Moore method for years in his topology course, but that’s an elective, so students could choose not to participate.)  Why, I wondered, don’t we ask instructors to justify lecture-based teaching?

There is a lot of new vocabulary for my algebra students as they take the leap to a higher level of abstraction.  As in a language class, they need to practice using that vocabulary and that abstract thinking with each other and with me.  It would help them much less if all they did in class was listen to me show and tell.  I’ve found that we don’t “cover” as much material as I did when I lectured, but I’m convinced that my students now learn more deeply and are more ready to learn independently.   Further, when students talk more and I listen more, I have a much better idea on any given day of where each student is.  I can identify and address misconceptions sooner.  I can also see who is catching on quickly and is ready for more challenging problems.

The last two times I’ve taught linear algebra, I’ve chosen not to use a textbook.  (Thanks, Frank, for helping me believe it’s possible.)  Again, there are raised eyebrows at this deviant behavior (though not from my department colleagues), and I mutter something about how expensive textbooks have become and how it keeps me honest to set my own agenda.  The truth is, though, that I want to get away from a system where homework is simply for practice and reinforcement of ideas introduced in class or the text.  Instead, I try to choose homework questions that invite experimentation and anticipate coming attractions.  In this way “going over homework” isn’t a necessary evil that threatens to eat up the class and bore half of the students, but rather a chance for students to hear each other’s ideas and for me to put them into a larger context.

Now for the confession:  in calculus classes, I still use a big fat heavy textbook and spend too much time talking.  It’s a more interactive picture than it used to be, but it’s too easy to slip back into old habits.   The justification, if I dare call it that, is that we as a department have a common understanding of what our calculus courses should cover, and it’s already hard to fit it into our twelve-week semesters.  (Midd faculty at large:  can we please get rid of Winter Term once and for all?)  If I were to move further toward a student-centered model, then I’d have to give up some topics that are generally considered essential.  But I’m not comfortable with the status quo.  A more active learning model should not be reserved for the mathematics majors.  Bressoud’s article describes a study of a physics class using clickers and peer instruction, but he’s not endorsing them as the only alternative to lecture; he promises that “(n)ext month I will write about other ways we can shut up and teach.”  I look forward to reading that column.

Advertisements

About Priscilla Bremser

Professor of Mathematics Middlebury College
This entry was posted in Inquiry-Based Learning. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Skipping Lecture

  1. I really, truly would not have survived Midd without Winter Term. There is nothing redeeming about winter in Vermont, if not the fact that you get to take crazy classes your friends back home have never heard of.

    But returning to the actual topic of the post…I wouldn’t have become a math major without Frank’s linear algebra class, and I think the textbook-less model was part of the reason I enjoyed it so much. I was really excited to go off-book for some topics with my pre-algebra class this past year, but it was not nearly as successful as I’d hoped. You’d think 7th graders would be all about the guided exploration and the fun in-class projects, but most of them were way too hung up on the “one true answer” issue to be comfortable exploring. I have them again for algebra this year, so I plan to keep trying, but I don’t know how to get them past the fear of being wrong — you would think such a small, tight-knit class wouldn’t have that problem, but not so.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s